list in directory join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More

Total Articles: 8

FMLA FAQ: Is a Reinstated Employee Short on "Hours Worked" Eligible for FMLA Leave?

We terminated an employee who has been reinstated by an arbitrator with full back pay. Now, he has requested FMLA leave. Are we obligated to provide leave even though he has not worked 1,250 hours in the previous 12 months?

FMLA FAQ: Is a Reinstated Employee Short on "Hours Worked" Eligible for FMLA Leave?

We terminated an employee who has been reinstated by an arbitrator with full back pay. Now, he has requested FMLA leave. Are we obligated to provide leave even though he has not worked 1,250 hours in the previous 12 months?

Court Finds Apprentice Program Constitutes “Joint Employer” for Purposes of FMLA Coverage.

A judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington recently ruled that a Seattle apprenticeship program was the “joint-employer” of a plumbing apprentice for purposes of coverage under the FMLA.

FMLA’s 1250 Hour Eligibility Requirement is Absolute.

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides that an employee is entitled to leave under certain circumstances, including a serious health condition that makes that individual unable to perform the functions of his or her job. Employers are prohibited from interfering with an eligible employee’s right to take the leave associated with that act. Under the FMLA, an “eligible” employee is one who has been employed for at least 12 months at the company, and who has worked a minimum of 1250 hours during the 12-month period immediately prior to the leave request.

Seventh Circuit Addresses “Joint Employer” Issue Under FMLA.

The federal appellate court with jurisdiction over Indiana recently addressed the “joint employer” issue under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for the first time. According to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the worker’s FMLA retaliation claim was properly dismissed because she failed to establish that the non-profit corporation she worked for was a joint employer with the city and county that financed and sponsored the corporation.

Designation As "Joint Employer" Requires Some Control Over The Work Or Working Conditions Of The Employee (7th Cir.).

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) makes it unlawful for any employer to interfere with an employee’s rights under that Act. Although the Act itself does not address situations in which multiple entities may be viewed as “joint-employers” for purposes of the FMLA, the Department of Labor (DOL) has issued regulations setting out situations in which joint-employer liability may be found.

Dealership Update: Counting Past Service For FMLA.

Most dealers know that in order to be eligible to request Family and Medical Leave, employees must meet three initial conditions.

Possible "Joint Employer" Status Allows FMLA Claim to Advance.

The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) applies to employers with 50 or more employees. In a recent decision that may have far-reaching consequences for an employer who contracts out employees to another company, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has held that a plaintiff may be able to count the employees of both companies in order to reach the 50-employee minimum required for liability under the FMLA.
Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password?I Want To Participate!