<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Employment Law Verdicts - Discrimination Verdicts</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/fedindex/23</link>
<description>Articles discussing verdicts in employment law and discrimination lawsuits.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:10:21 EST</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-us</language>


<item>
<title>$1 Million Jury Award Upheld for Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (pdf).</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=5422</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 5422</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>In Lubke v. Arlington, 2006 WL 1793268 (5th Cir),
a city fire fighter, Kim Lubke (“Lubke”), sued the City
of Arlington, Texas (“Arlington”) alleging that he was
discharged in violation of the Family and Medical Leave
Act (“FMLA”) as a result of missing work to care for his
ill wife. Lubke was a twenty-two year veteran of
Arlington’s fire department, and was a Battalion Chief
in charge of eight fire stations and forty to fifty
employees.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>$61 Million Jury Award Highlights the Importance of Investigating All Complaints of Harassment and Discrimination.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=5268</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 5268</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>The June 2, 2006 state jury award of $61 million to two Federal Express drivers in their racial and ethnic harassment lawsuit demonstrates how costly it can be for employers who do not properly investigate complaints of illegal harassment and discrimination.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>EEOC Serves Up A Heap Of Trouble At Cracker Barrel.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=5217</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 5217</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Last March, Cracker Barrel restaurants, a well-known chain known for folksy charm, agreed to pay $2 million to settle a class action workplace discrimination lawsuit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of 51 individuals. All are current or former employees of three Cracker Barrel restaurants in Illinois. Some claimed that they were sexually or racially harassed, others that they were retaliated against after they complained to management about the harassment. EEOC v. Cracker Barrel.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Recent Ruling Addresses Enforceability Of Settlement Agreements (pdf).</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=5165</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 5165</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>A thorny problem in settling employment
cases often arises when an employee
has a change of heart after accepting
a settlement offer and either refuses
to sign a written agreement or attempts
to set aside the agreement by
claiming that it was a mistake, was
based on bad advice from his or her
counsel, or was never authorized. A
recent federal appellate court decision
demonstrates that the employee has a
very heavy burden of proof in such situations,
and employers usually will be
able to hold the employee to the agreement.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Merrill Lynch Settlement of FLSA Collective Action Draws Scrutiny of Broker Compensation Arrangements.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=4541</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 4541</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>In a case with significant consequences to the financial industry, Merrill Lynch has agreed to pay up to $37 million to approximately 3,250 of its California stock brokers to settle claims that it failed to pay overtime wages.  The settlement may spur interest in overtime pay claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and perhaps state wage and hour laws by other stock brokers, as well as inside salespersons in other segments of the financial industry.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>When Throwing In The Towel Is A Good Thing (pdf).</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=4472</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 4472</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>On June 16, 2005, a U.S. District Court judge approved a settlement
agreement between Ford Motor Company and 3,400 black employees
alleging race discrimination. The employees alleged that Ford was accepting
white employees into the apprenticeship program at a far higher rate
than black employees.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal Stink Over Perfume Allergy Nets Employee $10.6 Million (pdf).</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=4396</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 4396</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Anyone who has walked through a department store has experienced
the pungent odors coming from the cosmetics department.
Customers test a myriad of perfumes, creams, and lotions that release floral
and fruit scents intended to tempt the individual to buy the cosmetic.
The cornucopia of smells permeating from the cosmetics department
causes many of us to either sneeze, breathe a little heavier, or simply walk
a little more quickly towards the mall entrance. Though a minor nuisance
for our shopping experience, a former Detroit disc jockey’s severe allergy
to a colleague’s perfume and her employer’s failure to accommodate the
allergy resulted in a $10.6 million judgment against the radio station and
its owner.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dade County Jury Awards $1.5 Million to Sexual Harassment Plaintiff .</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=3982</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 3982</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>A Florida District Court of Appeals recently reinstated a verdict of $1,516,000 as damages for sexual harassment based on a hostile work environment and retaliatory discharge.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Restaurant Chain Serves Up $360,000 For Discrimination Against Male Employees (pdf).</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=3830</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 3830</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>After challenging the authority of the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC) to bring a discrimination suit on
behalf of male employees nationwide and
contesting the EEOC's efforts at conciliation,
the Jillian's restaurant chain entered
into a consent agreement to resolve the suit.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>High-Profile Overtime Case Nears $210M End After 8 Years (pdf).</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=3771</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 3771</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>After almost a decade of litigation, Farmers Insurance Exchange has
agreed to pay $210 million to settle a class-action overtime lawsuit
brought under California law.</description>
</item>
</channel>

</rss>

