join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
Karlo v. Pittsburgh Glass Works

Articles Discussing Case:

Third Circuit Upholds Subgroup Disparate Impact Claims Under the ADEA

Ogletree Deakins • February 21, 2017
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently created a circuit split when it disagreed with prior decisions from the Second, Sixth, and Eighth Circuits regarding the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). In Karlo v. Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, No. 15-3435 (January 10, 2017), the Third Circuit held that “subgroup” disparate impact claims are cognizable under the ADEA.

Third Circuit Rules "Subgroup" Disparate Impact Claims Are Cognizable Under the ADEA

Littler Mendelson, P.C. • February 14, 2017
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently became the first appellate court to find that so-called “subgroup” disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which prohibits age discrimination against individuals age 40 and older.