join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (U.S. 2010)

Articles Discussing Case:

Supreme Court Holds ERISA-Based Attorneys' Fees Available.

Fisher Phillips • May 25, 2010
On May 24, 2010 the U. S. Supreme Court held that a party does not need to be a "prevailing party" in order to be eligible for an attorneys' fees award under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). In reaching this decision, the Court relied on the statutory language of the applicable statute, which does not include any "prevailing party" requirement, and noted that Congress is able to impose limitations on the availability of attorneys' fees when it deems fit. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.