list in directory join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
« Back
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of Am. v. Napolitano, Case No. 09-2006 (9/9/09)

Articles Discussing Case:

Fourth Circuit Refuses to Stay Implementation of Federal Contractor E-Verify Rule.

Ford & Harrison LLP • September 11, 2009
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has denied a motion to stay implementation of the federal contractor E-Verify rule pending resolution of challenges filed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and several business groups. See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of Am. v. Napolitano, Case No. 09-2006 (9/9/09). Accordingly, the E-Verify rule – which took effect on September 8, 2009 – remains in effect for qualifying federal contracts and subcontracts entered into on or after that date.
Browse By Plaintiff/Appellant

A • B • C • D • E • F • G • H • I • J • K • L • M • N • O • P • Q • R • S • T • U • V • W • X • Y • Z •

Browse By Court

Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password? • I Want To Participate!

• Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP | Retaliation Redux: Two cases that should scare employers a lot (February 06, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | Employees Must Be Given Clear, Actual Notice of FMLA Policies (February 01, 2012)

• Franczek Radelet P.C | Giants Beat Patriots in the Super Bowl! Can I take FMLA Leave Today? (February 08, 2012)

• Ogletree Deakins | Can A Paid Break Become Unpaid? (February 02, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | Interviewing The Pawn Stars Way (February 02, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | Obamacare By The Numbers (February 03, 2012)

• Ford & Harrison LLP | Title VII Record-Keeping Requirements Extended to GINA (February 06, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | New Clarifications and Guidance on W-2 Reporting (February 03, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | It's 2012 And The NLRB Is Off To A Fast – And Controversial – Start (February 02, 2012)

• Jackson Lewis LLP | Warning: ICE Build-Up a Worry for Employers Navigating I-9 Compliance (February 03, 2012)

• Ogletree Deakins | Indiana | Indiana Enacts Right-to-Work Law: Becomes the Only Right-to-Work State in the Central Midwest (February 02, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | New Mexico | Santa Fe Local Ordinance Sets Country's Highest Minimum Wage Requirement (February 02, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | A Moving Target: The California DLSE Modifies Again Its FAQs on California's New Wage Notice Required for Hourly Employees (February 01, 2012)

• Jackson Lewis LLP | Indiana | Indiana Adopts Right-to-Work Law (February 03, 2012)

• Ogletree Deakins | Pennsylvania | Employment at-will remains a viable concept - at least in Pennsylvania. (February 06, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | Indiana | Right Here, Right Now: Indiana Passes Right-to-Work Legislation (February 07, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | Indiana | Indiana Enacts Right-To-Work Legislation: Will The Rest Of The Rust Belt Follow? (February 06, 2012)

• Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP | Indiana | Indiana Enacts Right-to-Work Law (February 06, 2012)

• Ford & Harrison LLP | Virginia | Virginia Supreme Court Overturns Long-Standing Precedent on the Enforceability of Noncompetition Covenants in Employment Agreements (February 08, 2012)

• Ogletree Deakins | Georgia | Georgia Supreme Court Decision Requiring Georgia Attorneys to Answer Georgia Garnishments May Be Overturned (February 08, 2012)

• Fourth Circuit | Wulff v. Sentara Healthcare, Inc. (D. Va. 2012)

• Fifth Circuit | John Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (5th Cir. 2012)

• Third Circuit | Edwards v. Geisinger Clinic, 3d Cir., No. 11-1528, Jan. 23, 2012

• Third Circuit | Haybarger v. Lawrence County Adult Probation & Parole, No. 10-3916 (3d Cir. Jan. 31, 2012)

• Eleventh Circuit | Mulhall v. UNITE HERE Local 355, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 944 (11th Cir. Jan. 18, 2012)

• California | Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions Corporation

• California | Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego

• Pennsylvania | Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott’s Development Company (Pa Sup. 2012)

• Sixth Circuit | Donald v. Sybra, Inc., No. 10-2153, 2012 WL 117612 (6th Cir. Jan. 17, 2012)

• California | Joaquin v. City of Los Angeles, No. B226685, California Court of Appeal (January 23, 2012)