Federal Article Feeds Tattoos and Religion
Do you think it is okay for an employer to refuse to hire applicants with visible tattoos because the employer wants to promote a wholesome image? Think again . . . .
Posted by Suzanne H. Stenson on 09/23 at 04:18 PM
If it is offensive then it should be covered anyway, no one should be showing anything offensive, it is totally unprofessional to be showing anything that could offend anyone. There is a huge difference between an offensive tattoo and a piercing, how can a piercing be offensive? It is not to everyone’s taste but it could not be offensive in the way a racist tattoo could be (for example). I have nothing against tattoos, I love them myself and have several, but even I can see the wisdom in keeping them covered at work.
Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/23 at 06:54 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Next entry: Where Do You Spend Your Time?
Previous entry: Heavy workers, hefty price