Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Get Our FREE Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Email:
Over 8,300 Subscribers! More Information

Friday, December 28, 2007

Week In Review (December 28, 2007)

Most Popular Federal Law Article

[url=“http://www.elinfonet.com/headcount.php?ID=12142”>Updated Employee Policies for 2008.</A>
This time of year, everyone has a “to-do” list that is too long. Employers are no exception. In addition to replacing outdated workplace posters and pamphlets, implementing the new I-9 form, and ensuring employees receive notice of their right to claim the Earned Income Tax Credit, employers should tune up their handbooks for the new year.
Located On: Shaw Valenza LLP

Most Popular State Law Article

<a >Tennessee High Court Finds Anti-Harassment Policy May Have Been Unreasonable.</A>
The Tennessee Supreme Court recently ruled against a local state university and its president on an employee’s claims of discrimination, but ruled in their favor on the employee’s retaliation claims. According to the state’s highest court, the employee who accused the president of sexual harassment could have reasonably believed that complaining about the harassment would have been futile because the university’s complaint procedure designates the president as the final decision-maker on all harassment claims.
Located On: Ogletree Deakins

Most Popular Headlines

<a TARGET=“_blank”]Top 10 weirdest workplace events[/url]
Courier News - December 27, 2007

Posted by Patrick Della Valle on 12/28 at 08:29 AM
Week in Review • (0) CommentsPermalink

Friday, December 21, 2007

Week In Review (December 21, 2007)

Most Popular Federal Law Article

[url=“http://www.elinfonet.com/headcount.php?ID=12084”>IRS Expands Medical Expense Deductions</A>
The IRS recently issued Revenue Ruling 2007-72 expanding Internal Revenue Code Section 213(a) to allow a medical expense deduction for certain diagnostic procedures. Section 213(a) of the Code allows individuals to deduct medical care expenses which are not covered by insurance as long as the expenses exceed 7.5% of the individuals adjusted gross income. Group health plans and health flexible spending account plans often reference Section 213(a) to describe the type of benefits that may be covered by a plan.
Located On: Littler Mendelson, P.C.

Most Popular State Law Article

<a >Important Change to California’s Pay Statement Requirements, Effective January 1, 2008.</A>
As the New Year approaches, California employers should be mindful of an important change that will take effect on January 1, 2008, relating to information that can be listed on employee pay statements. Under California Labor Code section 226, employers must include certain itemized information on each employee’s pay statement. (This information must be provided separately for each pay period when the wages are paid by personal check or cash.)
Located On: Ogletree Deakins

Most Popular Headlines

<a TARGET=“_blank”]What not to do in ‘The Office’[/url]
MSNBC - December 18, 2007

Posted by Patrick Della Valle on 12/21 at 10:49 AM
Employment Law • (0) CommentsPermalink

Friday, December 07, 2007

Week In Review (December 7, 2007)

Most Popular Federal Law Article

[url=“http://www.elinfonet.com/headcount.php?ID=11946”>Top Ten Ways To Hold A Company Party—Without Getting Sued.</A>
With the Holiday Season in full swing, many employers ask us about the wisdom of holding company parties where alcohol will be served. They generally want to know about the risk involved if an employee drinks too much at the party and misbehaves, or worse injures or kills someone on the way home.
Located On: Fisher & Phillips, LLP

Most Popular State Law Article

<a >Breaking The “Culture of Silence”.</A>
Connecticut is the latest state to recognize the importance of facilitating honest and open employment references. In an attempt to open the lines of communication concerning former employees, the Connecticut Supreme Court found that employers’ comments are privileged and that workers cannot sue for defamation if their former employer makes untrue statements while trying to provide a good-faith assessment.
Located On: Fisher & Phillips, LLP

Most Popular Headlines

<a TARGET=“_blank”]EEOC Spells Out Good & Bad on Employee Screening[/url]
Occupational Health & Safety - December 05, 2007

Posted by Patrick Della Valle on 12/07 at 10:17 AM
Week in Review • (0) CommentsPermalink
Page 1 of 1 pages
 
Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

Copyright © 2009 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.