Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Forms
HR Training
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Enter Your Email Address Below!

Daily Weekly  [More Information]

Wednesday, March 23, 2005

“Off the Clock” Conduct Leads to Termination

Jay, a 53-year-old married man, enjoyed acting in a local theater group on his own time.  In fact, he recently landed a starring role as Daddy Warbucks in the theater group’s presentation of “Annie.” Jay found himself smitten by a 16-year-old girl who also acted in the play.  Jay sent her an email expressing his love for her.  He also met with the girl, turned the lights down, lit a candle, and shared non-alcoholic Bananas Foster with her while playing music from “The Phantom of the Opera.” There is no report of any inappropriate physical contact between the two, and no allegation of illegal conduct.  Can this “off the clock” conduct result in Jay losing his job?

The answer from Marion County, Indiana is a resounding “YES,” especially given that Jay Meisenhelder was a Deputy Prosecutor and Assistant Chief of the Sex Crimes Division in the county.

Once I got past my “What WAS he THINKING?” reaction to this story, I reflected on the recent reports of termination following what many would consider “private conduct.” There exists a widely-held opinion that private conduct is none of the boss’s business (perhaps reinforced by the very visible acquittal of Bill Clinton after the Clinton/Lewinsky affair and related, admittedly false, Clinton testimony.) However, employers do have and do take an interest in conduct that, though not directly related to job performance, can have some impact on the employer.  This is true even if that impact is only loss of character reputation of the employee.  This is also true even if the conduct broke no laws, but only reflected “poor judgment.” Employees should understand this.  Employers may be able to help prevent some of these embarrassing situations by addressing this issue when providing education and training.

Posted by Suzanne H. Stenson on 03/23 at 11:46 AM
(0) Comments • (0) TrackbacksPermalink
Page 1 of 1 pages
 
Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.